There is a pattern I've watched repeat across every major technology restructuring I've been close to over the last 18 months. Amazon. Meta. Accenture. Dell. Cisco. Salesforce. Google. Atlassian.

Two kinds of leaders emerge. And the difference between them doesn't show up at the six month mark or the twelve month mark. It shows up in the first few weeks. In the small decisions made while the shock is still fresh and the path forward is still completely unclear.

The first kind moves early. Not recklessly. Not without thought. But they make a decision quickly  before the pattern sets in.  They grieve appropriately and then they get on with it. They are going to use the disruption as permission to reach for what they have always been capable of but never had the pressure to pursue. They do the positioning work. They land better. Every time.

The second kind waits.

Some of them wait because the financial pressure pushes them toward the first safe thing they can find. A familiar title. Similar compensation. Back to known ground as quickly as possible. They land something that feels stable. Within six months they're plateaued again at the same ceiling they'd already hit. The layoff didn't change their trajectory. It just reset the clock on the same limitations.

Others wait longer. They tell themselves they're being thoughtful. Strategic. Waiting for the right opportunity. Giving the market time to settle. What they're actually doing (and I say this with genuine compassion because I've watched it happen repeatedly) is letting the pattern of processing replace the work of positioning, and of taking action. Months pass. The best roles fill. The organizations that were actively rebuilding their leadership tier complete that process. The window that existed in the early disruption narrows. And twelve months after the layoff they're competing in a more crowded market for what's left, with less leverage than they had the day they got the call.

It's hard to get out of patterns. Under stress we default to what feels safe. Waiting feels safer than reaching. Processing feels safer than moving. That's not weakness. That's how humans respond to disruption.

But the window doesn't wait while you process.

I want to be specific about what I mean by the window, because I've watched people dismiss this framing as artificial urgency. It isn't.

When organizations restructure at the scale we've seen over the last 24 months, they don't just cut. They rebuild. They redefine their leadership profiles. They create new roles, often at higher levels than what existed before, built around a different set of capabilities and a different vision of what executive leadership looks like in an AI-shaped organization.

That rebuilding process is active right now. The organizations that cut in 2023 and 2024 are defining their next leadership tier. They are recruiting for it. And they are doing it with a specific profile in mind: leaders who can communicate enterprise-level impact, who are seen as strategic thinkers rather than technical operators, who walk into a conversation and immediately signal executive readiness.

The supply of displaced technology leaders in the market is high. The supply of displaced technology leaders who are properly positioned to communicate enterprise impact is much lower than organizations expect. That gap is the window.

It closes as the rebuilding completes. As the urgent roles get filled. As organizations settle back into their new structures. At that point the market returns to its default state, and advancement goes back to the slower, more incremental path.

We are not at that point yet. But we are moving toward it faster than most people realize.

If you were caught in the Atlassian layoffs last month, or the Amazon restructuring, or any of the cuts that have happened across this industry over the last 18 months, I want to speak to you directly now.

Not with a cautionary tale about what happens if you wait - you just read that.

But with something specific.,,,

I've been the person making hiring decisions at the executive level. I know exactly what decision-makers look for when they're evaluating whether someone belongs in a Senior Director, VP, or CIO role. I know what signals executive readiness and what signals an excellent operator who isn't quite ready for the next level.

And I know that most technology leaders are communicating the wrong message. Not because they lack the capability. Because they've never done the deliberate work of building those communication in high stakes interview situations.

That's what costs people in a restructuring. And that's what costs people in the window after a restructuring, when the roles are there but the competition is high and the leaders who positioned themselves early are already in the conversation.

This is precisely the kind of problem the Executive Positioning Sprint was designed to solve. 

It’s a 30-day intensive program designed to reposition you so you’re seen, evaluated, and selected as an enterprise leader. 

Here’s what we’ll do over the next 30 days:

I'm only looking to take on 5 people for this particular program, so if  you’re interested click below to learn more.

Click here to learn more about the Executive Positioning Sprint (5 people max)

Robert

Follow me on LinkedIn

Join the IT Leadership Excellence Network on LinkedIn